Talk:Morphic resonance

Red link or redirect?

I'm not sure having this page as a red link is a good idea. Its linkes from a number of article namely: Telepathy, Rupert Sheldrake, Intuition (psychology), List of topics characterized as pseudoscience, Ankh-Morpork City Watch, John Maddox, Systemic Constellations, The Power of Five Grand supercycle Family Constellations and having a redirect to Rupert Sheldrake#Origin and philosophy of morphic resonance will help reader from other articles find something about it.--User:Salix alba (talk): 07:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

You have just very clearly demonstrated why an article called Morphic resonance is required. You have shown that Telepathy, Rupert Sheldrake, Intuition (psychology), List of topics characterized as pseudoscience, Ankh-Morpork City Watch, John Maddox, Systemic Constellations, The Power of Five Grand supercycle Family Constellations etc are all linked to a redirect page, a non existant article. Nobody following the links from those articles can find out anything about Morphic resonance, but they can see lots of mentions of the term but no explanation/definition. If Morphic resonance is so important it deserves its own dedicated article. Moriori (talk) 08:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I thought that was the whole idea of redirects. MR doesn't deserve its own article unless it can be shown that either that (1) it has some scientific merit or (2) someone is working on it who is independent of its originator. Barney the barney barney (talk) 08:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)